How good are these forecasts?
Every forecast scored on seasons the model never saw while its settings were chosen.
Held-back seasons
| Forecast | Forecasts | Log loss | Favourite won |
|---|---|---|---|
| The model | 726 | 0.979 | 52% |
| Base rate | 726 | 1.075 | 44% |
| Recent form | 726 | 1.007 | 50% |
| Betting market | 720 | 0.966 | 54% |
Against the betting markets
Each market's price before the start, scored on the same finished games as the model. A negative figure means the market was more accurate.
| Market | Since | Priced | Model log loss | Market log loss | Model vs market |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bookmakers (Pinnacle, DraftKings, bet365) | 21 Jan 2026 | 246 | 1.002 | 0.989 | −1.3% |
| Polymarket | 13 Sep 2025 | 378 | 0.995 | 0.986 | −0.9% |
| Kalshi | 31 Oct 2025 | 322 | 1.010 | 1.006 | −0.4% |
A draw is its own outcome: the model has a band around an even contest in which a draw is the likeliest single result, fit on the tuning seasons.
The market comparison uses the bookmakers' closing odds with their margin taken out.
Team news, injuries and rotation for European games are not in the model.
Expected goals are not in the rating yet; it learns only from results.
Questions and answers
How accurate are PodiumOracle's Eredivisie predictions?
On 726 games from held-back seasons (2024–25 to 2026–27), which the model never saw while it was tuned, the side it favoured won 52% of the time. Its log loss was 0.979, against 1.075 for the base rate and 1.007 for recent form, and 0.966 for the closing betting odds. Against the betting markets on the same finished games, its log loss was 1.002 against the bookmakers' 0.989 over 246 games, 0.995 against Polymarket's 0.986 over 378 games and 1.010 against Kalshi's 1.006 over 322 games (lower is better).