How good are these forecasts?

Every forecast scored on seasons the model never saw while its settings were chosen.

Held-back seasons

ForecastForecastsLog lossFavourite won
The model7100.92954%
Base rate7101.08042%
Recent form7100.97254%
Betting market7100.91456%

Against the betting markets

Each market's price before the start, scored on the same finished games as the model. A negative figure means the market was more accurate.

MarketSincePricedModel log lossMarket log lossModel vs market
Bookmakers (Pinnacle, DraftKings, bet365)23 Jan 20262140.9300.912−2.0%
Polymarket26 Sep 20252990.9010.887−1.6%
Kalshi31 Oct 20252750.9070.893−1.6%

A draw is its own outcome: the model has a band around an even contest in which a draw is the likeliest single result, fit on the tuning seasons.

The market comparison uses the bookmakers' closing odds with their margin taken out.

Team news, injuries and rotation for European games are not in the model.

Expected goals are not in the rating yet; it learns only from results.

Questions and answers

How accurate are PodiumOracle's Primeira Liga predictions?

On 710 games from held-back seasons (2024–25 to 2026–27), which the model never saw while it was tuned, the side it favoured won 54% of the time. Its log loss was 0.929, against 1.080 for the base rate and 0.972 for recent form, and 0.914 for the closing betting odds. Against the betting markets on the same finished games, its log loss was 0.930 against the bookmakers' 0.912 over 214 games, 0.901 against Polymarket's 0.887 over 299 games and 0.907 against Kalshi's 0.893 over 275 games (lower is better).